By John Q. Hosedrinker 
German chancellor candidate Friedrich Merz has pledged to give Russia a 24-hour ultimatum to cease its aggression against Ukraine if elected. He has not ruled out direct communication with Vladimir Putin, but insists that if Russia does not comply, he would authorize strikes on Russian territory and provide Ukraine with Taurus long-range cruise missiles. This stance contrasts with current Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who has rejected supplying Taurus missiles and striking Russian territory. With Germany’s ruling coalition collapsing, early general elections are expected in March 2025, potentially setting the stage for a shift in German policy towards the Ukraine conflict.
Read the original article here
German chancellor candidate Friedrich Merz has vowed to give Russian President Vladimir Putin a 24-hour ultimatum to end the war in Ukraine. This ultimatum would involve the threat of delivering Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine if the bombardment of civilians doesn’t stop. Merz believes that this decisive action would put Ukraine in a position to seize the initiative again, potentially ending the conflict.
Merz’s stance on the war in Ukraine is markedly different from that of current German Chancellor Olaf Scholz. While Scholz has been hesitant to provide Ukraine with certain weapons systems, like the Taurus, Merz believes Germany needs to do everything it can to support Ukraine’s defense. He argues that Germany’s role in this conflict shouldn’t be passive; instead, it should be actively engaged in providing Ukraine with the necessary tools to defend itself.
Merz’s proposed ultimatum has been met with mixed reactions. Some view it as a necessary step to end the conflict, arguing that only a strong, decisive action will force Russia to back down. They believe that Putin has shown a disregard for international norms and that he must be confronted with serious consequences.
However, others have expressed concerns about the potential for escalation. They fear that Merz’s ultimatum could lead to a wider conflict, even a potential World War III. There’s worry that providing Ukraine with more advanced weapons could be seen by Russia as a direct provocation and lead to further escalation.
The potential consequences of Merz’s ultimatum are significant. If successful, it could lead to the end of the war in Ukraine and a return to peace and stability in the region. However, if it fails, it could result in a wider, more destructive conflict, potentially involving NATO.
Merz’s proposal is a bold one, and it has the potential to change the course of the war in Ukraine. But it also carries significant risks. The ultimate outcome of his ultimatum remains to be seen, but it is a situation that will be watched closely by the international community.
It’s important to note that Merz’s 24-hour ultimatum is a proposal, and it’s unclear whether it will be implemented if he becomes Chancellor. The German public’s reaction to his stance on the war in Ukraine is still developing, and it is unclear if a majority supports his hawkish approach. Furthermore, the decision to provide Ukraine with Taurus missiles ultimately rests with the German government and would require a careful and strategic assessment of the potential risks and rewards.
The war in Ukraine continues to be a volatile and complex situation, and any actions taken by the international community will have far-reaching consequences. It’s critical that all parties involved work towards a peaceful resolution, and that any decisions are made with the utmost care and consideration.