By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Special Counsel Jack Smith dropped all federal charges against President-elect Donald Trump regarding mishandling classified documents and attempts to overturn the 2020 election. This decision, citing the Department of Justice’s longstanding policy against indicting a sitting president, comes despite the gravity of the alleged crimes. Conservative judicial rulings, including a Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, significantly impacted the case’s dismissal. The DOJ’s policy, established during Watergate, prioritizes a president’s ability to perform their duties unimpeded by legal proceedings, ultimately preventing further prosecution. Smith’s team plans to resign before Trump’s inauguration.
Read the original article here
Jack Smith files to drop Jan. 6 charges against Donald Trump, and the reaction is one of widespread outrage and disillusionment. The decision feels like a profound failure of the justice system, leaving many to question the very foundations of American democracy. The perception is that a two-tiered system exists, one for the wealthy and powerful, and another for everyone else. This perceived injustice fuels a deep sense of betrayal and anger.
This outcome is seen as a complete collapse of accountability for those in positions of power. The argument is that elected officials, even those accused of serious crimes, face minimal consequences, often escaping with a mere reprimand or resignation. This perceived weakness in the system emboldens others to exploit it, further eroding public trust and fueling political polarization.
The decision to drop the charges is interpreted by many as a blatant capitulation to the pressures of a potentially violent reaction from Trump’s supporters. This action is not just seen as a failure of justice, but a surrender to domestic terrorism, allowing powerful individuals to operate with impunity. This leads to a sense of powerlessness and despair, a feeling that the system is rigged against the average citizen.
The long-standing DOJ policy of not indicting a sitting president is heavily criticized as a cowardly cop-out, a convenient excuse to avoid confronting a powerful and potentially dangerous figure. The argument is that this policy protects powerful individuals from accountability, regardless of their actions. It is seen as a betrayal of the principle that no one is above the law. The idea of a “sitting president” is dissected – Trump isn’t currently holding office, yet the charges are dropped regardless. This loophole is widely seen as absurd.
The overall sentiment expressed is one of profound disappointment and cynicism. The American dream, the ideals of justice and equality, are seen as tarnished, if not outright shattered. The belief that hard-won legal rights are being eroded and are now mostly accessible only to the wealthy and powerful is prevalent. Many feel this decision is a devastating blow to the rule of law and a chilling affirmation of the notion that the powerful can, and will, get away with anything.
The inability – or unwillingness – to hold Trump accountable is deeply unsettling. It’s viewed as a dangerous precedent, potentially emboldening future politicians to act with impunity, knowing they are unlikely to face consequences. This creates a profound sense of injustice and fuels a deep-seated distrust in the government and its institutions. The feeling that democracy is dying is pervasive and the concern that future elections will also be manipulated by powerful individuals is shared by many. This sentiment extends to broader questions about the fairness and efficacy of the entire justice system.
There’s a pervasive feeling that this decision represents the ultimate victory for those who would undermine democratic institutions and processes. The event is lamented as a stark illustration of the inherent inequalities within the American system, reinforcing the notion that the scales of justice are tipped heavily in favor of the wealthy and powerful. This outcome leaves many feeling hopeless and cynical about the future of the country, questioning the very foundations of their belief in the American system. The belief that the system is rigged and favors only the powerful is pervasive and fuels a sense of despair.
The conclusion drawn by many is that the rule of law is not only failing but has actively been circumvented. This failure leaves a bitter taste, reinforcing the sentiment that those with enough money and power can avoid accountability for even the most egregious acts. The frustration and anger felt is palpable, leaving a profound sense of disillusionment and a grim outlook on the future of American justice. The perception that nothing will be done to rectify this situation further exacerbates feelings of despair and powerlessness.