By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following President-elect Trump’s nomination, Matt Gaetz resigned from Congress, leaving his House seat vacant. His resignation was effective immediately, and he explicitly stated he wouldn’t assume the seat again. While a special election is required by the Constitution to fill the vacancy, Gaetz is not guaranteed to win this election. Although he could run, Florida’s governor is responsible for scheduling the election, and there’s no guarantee of his re-election.
Read the original article here
No, Matt Gaetz is not guaranteed to get his House seat back after withdrawing his nomination. This isn’t simply a case of resigning and then casually resuming his position. The situation is far more complex and hinges on several key factors. First, his resignation was from his *current* term, not the one he was re-elected to begin in January. This distinction is crucial.
His withdrawal from consideration for Attorney General doesn’t automatically reinstate him to his current congressional seat. That seat is vacant, requiring a process of filling the vacancy, likely through a special election governed by Florida state law. Any claim that his re-election for the next term retroactively fills the vacancy is inaccurate. The Constitution is quite clear: a vacated seat remains vacant until filled through the established procedures.
The idea that his re-election somehow magically restores his current term is a misunderstanding. The two terms are distinct; he resigned from one, and his re-election applies only to the next. A special election will almost certainly need to be held to fill the remainder of his current term, and there’s no guarantee he’ll win that election.
Furthermore, even if he were somehow to be appointed to the vacant seat – which is unlikely given his unpopularity, even within his own party – the ethics report would still hang over his head. The possibility of the report being released and containing damaging information could significantly impact his chances, not only in a special election but in his standing within the political sphere. In short, he hasn’t simply taken a brief leave; he’s left a significant opening.
The timing of his resignation, just before the anticipated release of the ethics committee report, is suspicious, and suggests this wasn’t a simple decision regarding the Attorney General position. This strongly suggests that he prioritized escaping the potentially damaging findings of the report over holding his current seat. The notion of this being merely a strategic maneuver to avoid shame and scrutiny is widely held.
It’s highly improbable that any Governor would appoint him, especially considering the intense scrutiny surrounding his actions. It’s a political risk no governor would likely take. Appointing Gaetz would be highly controversial and would generate significant negative press for the governor.
While speculation abounds about future political moves—a gubernatorial run in Florida, for instance—the immediate reality is clear: he’s not simply resuming his seat in Congress. A special election is almost certainly the next step, and whether he wins that is highly uncertain. His previous actions and the weight of the anticipated ethics report strongly suggest that a return to his former seat is unlikely.
Finally, the suggestion that the Republican Party would somehow override the process to install him is equally unrealistic. His actions have alienated many within his own party, and there is little indication of a groundswell of support for reinstating him. The idea of such a maneuver happening is more theater than reality. The likelihood is that his political future is considerably more uncertain than some might assume. The events surrounding his resignation and the pending ethics report make a smooth transition back to his old seat highly improbable. He faces a significantly uphill battle should he seek re-election.