By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Donald Trump’s appointment of Pete Hegseth as a potential Secretary of Defense is driven by superficial appearances rather than qualifications. While Hegseth’s lack of experience and expertise in defense policy is concerning, his “manly” image and ability to appeal to the “MAGA” movement’s idealized vision of masculinity have made him a suitable candidate for Trump. Hegseth embodies a fragile masculinity, craving a military dominated by white men, where diversity is seen as a threat and women are relegated to supporting roles. Trump’s choice of Hegseth further underscores his preference for superficial appearances and his disdain for genuine expertise and experience, mirroring his own reliance on manufactured success and image over real achievements.
Read the original article here
Pete Hegseth, the Fox News host, is being considered for the position of Secretary of Defense. This is a clear example of how the MAGA movement values appearances over substance. Hegseth embodies the shallow and often dangerous kind of masculinity that thrives in the MAGA world.
Hegseth, a self-proclaimed strongman, is a walking contradiction to the ideals of true masculinity. He often brags about his military service, but his actions reveal a different story. He was removed from guarding Biden’s inauguration due to his association with extremist groups, a serious security concern that raises questions about his judgment and fitness for such a critical role.
This appointment seems like a blatant attempt to appease the MAGA base, a group known for its adoration of aggressive and boisterous displays of “masculinity.” Hegseth, with his aggressive rhetoric and seemingly “tough” persona, fits the mold perfectly. It’s a blatant disregard for competency and experience, a pattern that has become all too common in Trump’s world.
The MAGA movement often criticizes diversity and inclusion initiatives, claiming they prioritize unqualified individuals. Yet, they celebrate Hegseth, a figure who lacks the experience and qualifications necessary to lead the Department of Defense. The hypocrisy is staggering.
The choice of Hegseth is a dangerous one. He is a symbol of the “fake masculinity” that pervades the MAGA movement, a brand of masculinity that prioritizes image over substance. Hegseth’s lack of experience, his association with extremist groups, and his history of questionable behavior make him a liability, not an asset. Hegseth’s appointment would be a slap in the face to the men and women who have served our country honorably and a dangerous step towards further division and instability.