By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Luxembourg’s Prime Minister Luc Frieden has called for the creation of a European army, arguing that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has highlighted the need for greater European defense capabilities. Frieden believes that a European army, fully integrated with NATO and a strong partner to the US, is essential to protect European interests and principles. He acknowledges the historical reluctance of member states to cede control over their militaries but emphasizes that the current security landscape requires a new approach. Frieden proposes a “coalition of the willing” as a first step, allowing for gradual progress towards a unified European defense force.
Read the original article here
The call for a European army is gaining momentum, fueled by growing anxieties surrounding the potential for a Trump victory in the upcoming US election. It’s not a new idea, but the urgency has intensified. The fear is that a Trump presidency would see a withdrawal from NATO, leaving Europe exposed and vulnerable.
While some argue that NATO would still exist, albeit in a different form, the sentiment is that Europe can no longer rely on the US for its security. There’s a sense that Europe needs to take its defense seriously and become self-sufficient, not just for its own sake but for the sake of the world. The US has been the world’s policeman for decades, and some believe this role has come at the cost of its own well-being.
There are strong voices advocating for a unified European military force, complete with its own nuclear deterrent. The argument is that Europe has the resources and the economic power to build a formidable army. Plus, boosting defense spending can also be beneficial to the economy. However, there are also significant obstacles. The UK, historically a thorn in the side of European unity, would likely oppose such a force. France, while supportive of a stronger European defense, may not be enthusiastic about sharing power.
The EU, often criticized for its bureaucracy and internal squabbling, may struggle to agree on a common defense strategy. There are questions about how the army would be structured, who would lead it, and what its goals would be. The language barrier alone could be a major hurdle.
Despite these challenges, the idea of a European army has gained traction in recent years. The potential for a Trump victory has only amplified the urgency, as many see it as a catalyst for a more independent and assertive Europe. Ultimately, the decision on whether to create a European army rests with the EU member states. If they can overcome their differences and find common ground, a unified European military could become a reality, ushering in a new era for Europe and the world.