By John Q. Hosedrinker 
North Korean soldiers who have been deployed to support Russia in the Ukraine are expected to suffer significant losses due to their lack of training for the geography and climate, according to Estonian Colonel Ants Kiviselg. North Korea has sent nearly 12,000 troops to Russia, including 500 officers and three generals, according to Ukraine’s military intelligence (HUR) however these soldiers have typically been trained to fight in mountainous terrain, unlike the conditions in Ukraine. Kiviselg suggests that communication issues between North Korean and Russian troops could also cause difficulties. His comments come as the Ukrainian conflict increases in intensity, with Russian forces reportedly advancing at its fastest rate since the early months of the war.
Read the original article here
North Korean troops could find themselves facing staggering losses in Ukraine, perhaps even greater than those sustained by Russian forces, and the implications of this scenario are chilling. The notion that the North Korean military is nothing more than cannon fodder underscores the reality that their primary purpose under the Kim family’s regime is to maintain power rather than engage effectively in overseas conflict. When I consider the sacrifices made by these soldiers, it feels especially tragic. For a populace that has survived under relentless oppression and food scarcity, being thrust onto the front lines of a war they are ill-equipped to handle feels like a final betrayal.
The physical condition of North Korean soldiers raises serious concerns about their effectiveness. Their malnourished, underdeveloped physiques—averaging around 5’4″—combined with a lack of recent combat experience in an unfamiliar environment speaks volumes about their potential performance. I find it hard to believe that these soldiers, often portrayed in meticulous parades, can transform from image to reality in a deadly battlefield context. It seems apparent that they are being sent as a desperate measure rather than a tactical advantage for Russia.
The thought that these soldiers will serve as a ground-holding force while Russian troops redeploy paints a grim picture of their destiny. The idea of Kim Jong-un, with his characteristic ruthlessness, sending thousands of troops to their doom while claiming it’s for a greater cause is heart-wrenching. It is a stark reminder of how regimes often expend human lives as disposable assets in their geopolitical games. North Korea has nothing to gain but the hollow promise of technology in return for lives lost. The stark truism that if every soldier sent in as cannon fodder is likely to face grim outcomes echoes painfully in my mind.
Ukrainian forces, shaped by years of grueling combat, are an entirely different caliber than this new influx of North Korean troops. They are not just defending their homeland; they are seasoned fighters against a backdrop of despair and fortitude. In light of this reality, the supposed addition of North Korean troops to the frontline seems ludicrous. The numbers suggest that thousands of North Koreans would not even equal the casualties endured by Russian forces in a matter of days. Their very presence symbolizes desperation rather than strength.
One can’t help but wonder about the logistics of these soldiers; feeding a malnourished army poses a considerable challenge. The notion that they might receive even basic provisions feels like a cruel joke, given Russia’s own ongoing shortages. The prospect of a starving, untrained group being thrust into a brutal conflict is unsettling and inviting future failures. Disease and the ongoing trauma of war will ripple through these ranks, solidifying their fate as a grim experiment in human sacrifice.
I question who commands these troops and what purpose they serve in the greater strategy of the Russian military. The complexities of Russian leadership make it hard to believe that North Korean commanders will have any real authority. Plagued by instability and the uncertainty of ongoing conflict, Russia isn’t in a position to utilize North Koreans as trusted allies. They are merely a tool in a larger machine, and one can only speculate how long Russia intends to use them before the inevitable chaos ensues.
The impulsive decision to integrate North Korean forces into the existing fabric of this war raises ethical concerns that ripple through the broader global community. The strategic implications of such a gamble provoke thoughts about the willingness of leaders to sacrifice their citizens in the names of power and control. Countries should be vigilant, as the intertwining of these regimes signals a disturbing trend where population control through warfare becomes a tactical objective.
Through these reflections, I am left grappling with profound sorrow—not just for the North Korean soldiers whose lives will be all but casually cast aside, but also for the ongoing tragedy of war, which teaches us the harsh and relentless nature of power dynamics. In this game, the players continue their desperate maneuvers, while the lives of countless individuals become collateral damage. Given these circumstances, one can only hope that clarity prevails in the hearts of those who lead and that the world witnesses a turning point before we descend further into chaos.