By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Handelsbanken’s head of forecasting, Johan Löf, predicts that President-elect Trump’s policies will lead to increased inflation. This resurgence of inflation poses a significant economic challenge. Löf’s analysis highlights the potential negative consequences of these policies on the U.S. economy. The forecast anticipates a considerable inflationary impact stemming from Trump’s proposed economic agenda.
Read the original article here
Inflation will return to haunt Trump, an economist suggests, and this prospect raises some intriguing questions about the political landscape. The potential for a resurgence of inflation under a Trump presidency isn’t merely a hypothetical concern; it’s a deeply rooted fear stemming from his past economic policies and the seemingly unwavering loyalty of his base.
It’s tempting to assume that voters would hold Trump accountable for any economic downturn, especially one fueled by inflation. However, a significant portion of his support base seems impervious to evidence contradicting their beliefs. Their unwavering devotion acts as a shield against criticism, no matter the severity of the consequences. They have proven remarkably resilient to past criticisms, whether concerning his campaign promises, actions in office, or even his personal conduct.
This loyalty raises a crucial point: the efficacy of traditional political accountability mechanisms may be eroding. The fact that Trump’s past actions have had minimal impact on his support base suggests that future economic struggles under his administration may also be met with similar levels of unwavering allegiance. It is entirely plausible that even a sharp increase in inflation will be readily dismissed or, more likely, attributed to external factors completely beyond his control, or even the fault of his political opponents.
The inherent difficulty in holding Trump accountable extends beyond his devoted followers. The sheer complexity of economic issues means that it’s relatively easy to obscure the connection between political actions and economic consequences. Trump’s communication style, characterized by simplicity and strong emotional appeals, further complicates the narrative. He’s a master at creating simplistic, emotionally charged explanations that appeal to his base, allowing him to circumvent complex economic realities.
One can easily envision a scenario where Trump attributes any economic hardship, including high inflation, to “fake news,” the actions of his political opponents, or even external global forces. This strategy successfully deflects responsibility and further strengthens his connection with those who already distrust mainstream media narratives. In such an environment, even clear economic evidence supporting a direct link between his policies and inflation might fail to sway public opinion within his core voting bloc.
The argument that inflation will not haunt Trump rests on a fundamental understanding of his support base. This unwavering loyalty extends to almost all aspects of his character and actions. It’s almost as if they are choosing to ignore the potential consequences, confident in his ability to weather any storm. This suggests that the traditional checks and balances within a democracy may be significantly less effective in holding him accountable than was once assumed.
Furthermore, the sheer speed with which his supporters embrace alternative realities, readily accepting his explanations and dismissing evidence to the contrary, makes it nearly impossible to anticipate any shift in their perspective. They have consistently demonstrated a willingness to disregard facts or evidence that conflict with their pre-existing beliefs about him.
Consequently, forecasting a meaningful change in opinion related to his economic policies is unrealistic. The potential for a resurgence of inflation under a Trump administration is real, but it’s highly unlikely to diminish his support. Instead, it’s more likely that his followers will continue to interpret the situation in a way that aligns with their preconceived notions, further solidifying their support and making him almost impervious to accountability. His past behavior suggests that he would exploit any resulting economic crisis for his own political benefit.
This situation paints a concerning picture for the future of American politics. It demonstrates the limitations of traditional accountability mechanisms when dealing with a politician who benefits from a base of unwavering, fact-resistant support. The challenge isn’t just managing inflation, but confronting a political landscape shaped by the erosion of trust in established institutions and the rise of fervent partisan loyalty. The consequences of this are far-reaching and extend beyond the mere economic impacts of inflation.