By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Drake’s company, Frozen Moments LLC, filed petitions in New York and Texas alleging that Universal Music Group (UMG) employed deceptive practices to artificially inflate the popularity of Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us,” a diss track targeting Drake. The petitions claim UMG used bots, paid for radio play (payola), and manipulated Spotify’s algorithms to boost the song’s streams, all while charging below-market licensing rates. These actions, Drake alleges, caused him significant financial harm and violated the RICO Act. UMG denies the allegations, stating their marketing practices are ethical and that fan preference drives music popularity.
Read the original article here
Drake recently claimed that Universal Music Group and Spotify artificially inflated the streaming numbers for Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us,” a song that has become incredibly popular. He seems to believe that this somehow disadvantaged him, suggesting a deliberate campaign to boost Lamar’s success at his expense.
This assertion has sparked considerable online discussion, with many questioning the validity of Drake’s claims. The widespread popularity of “Not Like Us,” evident across various platforms and demographics, suggests a genuine audience connection rather than solely algorithmic manipulation.
Many observers pointed out that the song’s success transcends just streaming platforms. Its catchiness and strong lyrical content have made it a ubiquitous presence, heard in various settings from car radios to school hallways. Even those not particularly fans of hip-hop seem to be aware of and, surprisingly, enjoy the song.
The widespread appeal of the song naturally leads to questions about the extent of any potential manipulation. If Universal Music Group and Spotify indeed colluded to inflate the song’s performance, why would the impact be so limited to only streaming numbers? The song’s real-world presence and popularity suggest it was a genuine hit that likely didn’t require artificial inflation to reach its level of success.
Some have suggested Drake’s statement stems from a bruised ego following a particularly scathing lyrical attack in “Not Like Us”. The song’s sharp lyrics and its resounding success have clearly hit Drake hard, prompting this unusual public outburst and accusations of manipulation.
The irony of Drake’s complaint, considering his own status within the music industry and past success, has not been lost on many. Several commenters highlighted instances of his own music enjoying widespread popularity, which implicitly raises the possibility that similar promotional strategies may have been employed for his own releases in the past. This hypocrisy has fueled considerable mockery aimed towards Drake online.
Adding fuel to the fire, the suggestion that Drake’s own career trajectory has seen similar levels of artificial inflation further weakens his current argument. If he has benefitted from such strategies himself, it suggests a level of hypocrisy in his current condemnation of the practices. This adds to the perception that his current pronouncements are primarily born out of bitterness rather than legitimate concern.
Some commentators have even joked about the situation potentially becoming a “Barbara Streisand effect,” where an attempt to suppress information inadvertently leads to its wider dissemination. By publicly airing his grievances, Drake has inadvertently renewed attention to “Not Like Us,” potentially increasing its popularity even further.
Regardless of the truth behind Drake’s claims, the situation has highlighted a broader discussion about the influence of streaming platforms and record labels on music charts and artist success. The power dynamics between artists, labels, and streaming services remain complex and open to debate.
The overall tone of online reactions to Drake’s outburst leans towards incredulity and amusement. Many find his accusations of artificial inflation to be unconvincing given the overwhelming evidence of the song’s organic popularity. The perception is that Drake’s actions are rooted in a poor reaction to defeat, leading him to lash out rather than accepting the situation.
In conclusion, Drake’s accusations regarding Universal Music Group and Spotify’s alleged actions surrounding “Not Like Us” have sparked significant online conversation. However, the widespread popularity of the song, its undeniable impact, and the inherent irony within Drake’s statement cast considerable doubt on his claims. The situation seems less about a conspiracy to inflate streaming numbers and more about a high-profile artist struggling to accept defeat, a narrative further intensified by widespread online commentary.