By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Progressive governors and attorneys general are taking a proactive stance against President-elect Trump’s anticipated policies, mirroring the resistance seen during his first term. States like California, New York, Illinois, and Massachusetts are enacting legislation and mobilizing legal resources to protect vulnerable populations, safeguard environmental regulations, and uphold reproductive rights. This “Trump-proofing” strategy employs state-level laws, lawsuits, and executive actions to counter potential federal overreach. Despite Trump’s improved performance in key blue states and a conservative-leaning judiciary, progressive leaders remain resolute in their opposition, vowing to fight for their constituents and the principles they believe in.
Read the original article here
Democratic governors across the country are actively seeking ways to protect their states’ laws from potential federal overreach, especially in light of the recent shift in political power. The fear is that a Republican-controlled federal government, with a conservative Supreme Court, may attempt to overturn or weaken state laws that are seen as progressive or liberal.
Many see this as a necessary step to safeguard their states’ values and priorities. They argue that, in the face of a potentially hostile federal government, states need to take proactive measures to protect their residents and preserve their autonomy. A significant concern is the potential for a national abortion ban, which could severely impact access to reproductive healthcare in many states.
The idea of using “states’ rights” as a shield against federal action is a contentious one. It has been a long-standing tool for both progressive and conservative causes, but its use often becomes entangled with historical issues of segregation and discrimination. Some argue that it’s a double standard for Democrats to embrace states’ rights now after criticizing its use in the past.
However, the current political climate has created a sense of urgency. There is a growing concern that the federal government may attempt to impose its will on the states, particularly in areas like abortion rights, environmental protections, and social welfare programs.
The strategy of “Trump-proofing” state laws is not without its limitations. Critics point out that a federal government with a strong majority in Congress and a supportive Supreme Court can likely override many state laws. They argue that the focus should be on building coalitions and mobilizing voters to resist the national agenda, rather than relying solely on state-level defenses.
Despite the challenges, Democratic governors remain determined to protect their states’ interests. They are exploring various strategies, including legal challenges, legislative maneuvering, and public education campaigns. They are also looking for ways to collaborate with other states to strengthen their collective resistance.
The effectiveness of these efforts remains to be seen. However, it is clear that the political landscape has shifted, and states are now taking a more proactive role in defending their values and interests. Whether this will be enough to withstand the potential for a national agenda remains a question that only time will answer.