By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In protest of President-elect Trump’s inauguration, some Washington, D.C. Airbnb hosts are removing their properties from the market. Led by resident Stacy Kane, this initiative aims to demonstrate disapproval of Trump’s past rhetoric and actions against the city. While the movement’s impact remains uncertain, with only a few hosts currently participating, it underscores the strong feelings some D.C. residents hold regarding Trump’s return to power. The protest highlights the deeply personal nature of this inauguration for many residents, given Trump’s past criticisms and actions related to the city.
Read the original article here
D.C. residents are expressing strong feelings about the upcoming Trump inauguration, leading to calls for a significant Airbnb action. Many are urging Airbnb hosts to refuse rentals to those perceived as Republicans attending the inauguration, effectively creating a blackout. This stems from deeply held political divisions and a desire to limit the influx of supporters of the incoming administration.
The proposed Airbnb blackout isn’t the only suggestion circulating. Some residents believe that increasing prices significantly and donating the extra profits to liberal causes is a more effective approach. This tactic, they argue, allows them to profit from the event while simultaneously supporting their preferred political ideologies and potentially hindering the event’s financial support structure.
Another proposed strategy focuses purely on financial gain. Many suggest significantly raising prices, regardless of the renter’s political affiliation, to capitalize on the high demand during the inauguration. This approach views the event as a prime opportunity for financial profit, with little to no consideration for the political implications.
Several commenters are embracing a more provocative strategy. They openly advocate for refusing service to those perceived as “MAGA” or Republican, emphasizing that political affiliation is not a protected class. This perspective suggests a willingness to openly discriminate against those with differing political views. However, the legality and ethical implications of such practices are not explicitly discussed.
Concerns are raised about the potential for backlash. Some commenters acknowledge the financial incentives for Airbnb hosts to participate, suggesting that the lucrative nature of the event will likely outweigh any political motivations. Others believe that any attempt at a blackout will fail, predicting a large turnout of Trump supporters regardless of the availability of Airbnb rentals.
There’s a recognition that other forms of resistance are feasible. For example, one suggestion was to target alternative platforms frequently used by the target audience, like Grindr, to create a different form of “blackout.” The suggestion is made without explicit ethical or legal consideration.
Further considerations highlight the wider political context. Several comments emphasize the deep political divisions in the U.S. and the desire to counteract perceived injustices. Other perspectives lament the lack of unity and propose a more inclusive approach that prioritizes bridging the gap between differing ideologies over direct opposition.
The overall tone of the comments reveals deep-seated frustrations and the widespread use of price gouging as a strategic response. Some commenters openly justify exploiting the high demand for accommodations to maximize personal financial gain, while others defend this approach by referencing similar tactics used by large corporations or by portraying it as a form of political action.
Despite the various proposals, a consistent theme of dissatisfaction with the political climate emerges. Several commenters express concern about the increasing polarization of American society and frustration with what they perceive as the unfairness and corruption within the political system. This suggests that the Airbnb suggestions are not isolated incidents but rather symptoms of deeper underlying political anxieties.
In conclusion, the discussion surrounding the proposed Airbnb blackout during the Trump inauguration reflects a complex interplay of political motivations, economic interests, and deep-seated frustrations. While some advocate for a complete boycott of Republican attendees, others see the event as a chance for financial gain, either for personal profit or for donating to causes that counteract the incoming administration’s policies. The various strategies suggest that the event has become a symbolic battleground, with the availability of Airbnb accommodations playing a central role.