By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Arshdeep Singh Gill, known as “Arsh Dalla,” a prominent figure in organized crime in Punjab, India, has been arrested in Canada and charged with firearm offenses following a shooting in Milton, Ontario. Dalla, who is also accused of ordering killings in India while residing in Canada, has been designated as a terrorist by the Indian government and was reportedly on their most wanted list. This arrest comes amidst heightened diplomatic tensions between Canada and India, with the Canadian government expelling Indian diplomats and consular officials over alleged targeted campaigns against Canadian citizens. Although India is claiming that they shared Dalla’s coordinates with Canadian authorities requesting his arrest, it remains unclear whether an extradition request was made or if Canada acted upon it.
Read the original article here
Arshdeep Singh Dalla, a man labelled as India’s “most wanted terrorist,” has been arrested in Canada on gun charges. This arrest has sparked a heated debate about Canada’s handling of individuals with alleged ties to terrorism, particularly those who have sought refuge within its borders.
Dalla, a prominent figure in organized crime in Punjab, India, has been linked to multiple murders and is believed to be associated with the Khalistan movement, a separatist group seeking to create an independent Sikh state. He has been living in Canada for several years, and the Indian government has publicly listed him as a terrorist.
Many are questioning Canada’s decision to grant refuge to individuals like Dalla, especially given the country’s extradition treaty with India. Some argue that the “political opponent” exception, which prevents the extradition of individuals deemed to be political opponents, is being exploited by criminals seeking protection from prosecution in India.
The concerns are amplified by the fact that Canada has a history of mishandling terrorism cases, most notably the Air India 182 bombing, where the Canadian government initially refused to extradite suspected terrorists, citing India’s recognition of Queen Elizabeth II as head of state. This historical precedent fuels fears that Canada is once again turning a blind eye to dangerous individuals.
The arrest of Dalla on gun charges has further inflamed tensions between India and Canada. While the charges are a welcome development, many are critical of Canada’s alleged inaction in responding to India’s requests to arrest and extradite Dalla. They argue that Canada’s reluctance to act emboldens individuals like Dalla, who may feel protected from accountability.
Critics point to the recent assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a prominent Sikh separatist leader in Canada, as evidence that India is willing to take matters into its own hands when Canada fails to act on its requests. This act, which took place on Canadian soil, has further exacerbated the already strained relationship between the two countries.
The situation highlights the complexities of navigating international relations in the face of terrorism and extradition requests. While Canada has a responsibility to protect its citizens and uphold its own legal system, it also needs to demonstrate its willingness to work with other nations to address shared security concerns.
The debate surrounding Dalla’s arrest and the broader issue of extradition requests underscores the need for a clear and consistent approach to dealing with individuals suspected of terrorism, particularly those who have sought refuge in Canada. It is crucial to balance the need for protection with the obligation to cooperate internationally and ensure that those who commit serious crimes are held accountable.