By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Former National Security Advisor John Bolton has expressed serious concerns regarding Donald Trump’s nominations of Rep. Matt Gaetz and Tulsi Gabbard for Attorney General and Director of National Intelligence respectively, calling for full FBI investigations into both candidates before their Senate confirmation hearings. Bolton specifically cited Gabbard’s past espousal of Russian propaganda and Gaetz’s ongoing Justice Department investigation as reasons for concern, stating their appointments pose a “serious threat” to national security and intelligence gathering. He believes these appointments represent a significant departure from traditional practices and raise alarming questions about the integrity and competence of the Trump administration.
Read the original article here
John Bolton, former National Security Advisor under President Trump, has urged the FBI to investigate two prominent figures in American politics: Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman, and Matt Gaetz, a Republican congressman. Bolton believes these individuals pose a “serious threat” to the United States, citing their political affiliations and potential ties to foreign adversaries.
Bolton’s call for an FBI investigation has generated a mixed response. Some individuals agree with his assessment, pointing to Gabbard’s past praise of Russian President Vladimir Putin and Gaetz’s alleged involvement in questionable financial dealings. They argue that the FBI should thoroughly investigate both individuals to ensure they are not acting against the best interests of the country.
However, others view Bolton’s accusations as a politically motivated attempt to discredit his opponents. They point to Bolton’s own checkered past, including his role in the Bush administration’s decision to invade Iraq, and question his motives for urging an FBI probe. Furthermore, critics argue that the FBI should not be used as a political tool to target individuals based on their political beliefs or associations.
The controversy surrounding Bolton’s call for an FBI investigation highlights a broader debate about the politicization of law enforcement in the United States. Some fear that the FBI has become too entangled in partisan politics, while others argue that the agency has a duty to investigate potential threats to national security, regardless of political affiliation.
The call for an FBI investigation into Gabbard and Gaetz underscores the deep divisions within American society. As the country grapples with political polarization, it remains to be seen whether the FBI will pursue Bolton’s request or whether the agency will remain above the political fray.
Ultimately, the question of whether Gabbard and Gaetz pose a “serious threat” to the United States is a matter of opinion. While Bolton has made his case, it is up to the FBI to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to warrant a full-scale investigation. The public will be watching closely to see how this situation unfolds.