By John Q. Hosedrinker I can’t quite wrap my head around the fact that pronouns and tribal affiliations are now forbidden in South Dakota public university employee emails. It’s baffling to think that in this day and age, where inclusivity and diversity are championed, such restrictions could be put in place. Imagine having to craft an email without using any pronouns – it feels like it would be akin to trying to write with one hand tied behind your back.
The idea of banning something as fundamental as pronouns seems not only extreme but also counterproductive. Pronouns are an essential part of language, allowing us to communicate effectively and respectfully. How are we supposed to refer to individuals without using pronouns like he, she, they, or them? It seems like an unnecessary burden to impose on employees who are simply trying to communicate in a clear and concise manner.
But the prohibition on tribal affiliations in correspondence strikes a different chord entirely. Tribal affiliations are a part of a person’s identity, their heritage, and their culture. To forbid individuals from sharing this information seems not only discriminatory but also an attempt to erase the diverse tapestry of backgrounds that make up our society. It’s a blatant violation of an individual’s right to express their identity freely.
It’s ironic that a state named after a tribe would seek to erase tribal affiliations in official communications. It speaks to a larger trend of erasure and suppression that has plagued minority communities throughout history. It’s a disturbing reminder of the power dynamics at play and the attempts to silence voices that do not align with the status quo.
But perhaps what is even more concerning is the prioritization of such trivial matters over pressing issues that affect the community. In a time when there are real problems like crime, drug use, homelessness, and infrastructure needs, it’s disheartening to see resources and attention diverted towards policing language in emails. It raises questions about the values and priorities of those in power and their commitment to serving the needs of the people.
Overall, the decision to forbid pronouns and tribal affiliations in South Dakota public university employee emails is not just about words on a screen. It’s about identity, freedom of expression, and the right to be seen and heard. It’s a reflection of a larger trend of censorship and control that is deeply concerning. As we navigate these challenging times, it’s essential to push back against such restrictions and uphold the values of inclusivity, diversity, and respect for all. It’s bewildering to think that pronouns and tribal affiliations are now banned in South Dakota public university employee emails. The very essence of effective communication is being stifled by these restrictions. Imagine the absurdity of trying to compose a message without using basic pronouns like he, she, they, or them – it’s like trying to navigate a labyrinth blindfolded.
The prohibition on pronouns seems not only extreme but also regressive. How can we effectively communicate without utilizing these fundamental components of language? It feels like an unnecessary and burdensome constraint placed on individuals who are simply trying to convey information clearly and efficiently.
On the other hand, the ban on tribal affiliations in correspondence is even more alarming. Tribal affiliations are an integral part of an individual’s identity and cultural heritage. To deny individuals the right to express this aspect of themselves is not only discriminatory but also an attempt to erase the rich diversity that makes our society unique. It’s a direct infringement on personal freedom and self-expression.
The irony of a state named after a tribe enforcing such restrictions on tribal affiliations is not lost. It underscores a troubling trend of erasure and marginalization of minority communities. It reflects a broader issue of power dynamics and attempts to silence voices that do not conform to the dominant narrative.
Moreover, the fact that such trivial matters are prioritized over pressing issues affecting the community is deeply concerning. Rather than addressing real challenges like crime, drug use, and infrastructure needs, resources are being diverted towards policing language in emails. It raises serious questions about the values and intentions of those in positions of authority.
Ultimately, the ban on pronouns and tribal affiliations in South Dakota public university employee emails goes beyond mere words on a screen. It speaks to larger themes of identity, freedom of expression, and the right to be recognized and respected. It’s a reflection of a broader pattern of censorship and control that should be challenged and resisted. In a world that increasingly demands inclusivity, diversity, and mutual respect, such restrictions have no place. It’s crucial to uphold these values and push back against any attempts to stifle individuality and expression.