South Korea keeps shattering its own record for the world’s lowest fertility rate, and it’s no surprise with the state of the work culture and the skyrocketing cost of raising a child in the country. The government’s proposal for a 69-hour workweek was fortunately rejected, but it’s a clear indication that there is little effort being made to address the root causes of this alarming trend. The statistic that 54.5% of all children born last year in South Korea are from upper-class families is a telling sign of the financial burden associated with having children in the country.

In the past, having children was seen as a financial investment – they could work on the family farm and support their parents as they got older. However, in today’s information age, children need to obtain a bachelor’s degree to secure a stable future, leading to substantial educational expenses from a young age. The intense pressure on children to excel academically, with private education starting from elementary school, only adds to the financial strain on families.

As someone born in violation of China’s one-child policy, I understand the implications of declining birth rates. The disappearance of terms like “sibling” and “cousin” from everyday vocabulary is a stark reminder of the impact of low fertility rates on societal structures. South Korea is on the brink of facing the long-lasting repercussions of a shrinking population, and it’s crucial for the country to address this issue urgently.

The push for higher profits and the relentless focus on economic growth are contributing to the decline in birth rates, with little consideration given to the well-being of individuals and families. The introduction of incentives to encourage childbirth may be a short-term solution, but the underlying issues of work culture and financial stress must be addressed to ensure sustainable growth and the well-being of future generations.

It remains to be seen how South Korea will tackle the challenge of its declining fertility rate. The country’s patriarchal society, toxic work culture, and societal pressures are all contributing factors that cannot be solved simply by throwing money at the problem. It’s time for a serious reevaluation of priorities and a shift towards creating a more sustainable and supportive environment for families to thrive.

In the face of declining birth rates worldwide, perhaps it’s time to reevaluate our obsession with endless growth and consider the environmental and social implications of overpopulation. South Korea’s struggles with low fertility rates are a stark reminder of the delicate balance between economic prosperity and the well-being of individuals and society as a whole. South Korea’s persistent challenge with maintaining a low fertility rate is a complex issue that reflects the country’s evolving societal norms and economic pressures. The rejection of the proposed 69-hour workweek sheds light on the detrimental impact of the work culture on families and individuals, making it increasingly difficult for many to consider starting a family. The staggering statistic that over half of children born in South Korea come from upper-class families underscores the financial strain and inequities surrounding child-rearing in the country.

The history of familial dynamics, from a time when children could support their parents on the farm to the present-day emphasis on education and academic success, highlights the shifting landscape of parenthood and financial responsibilities. The personal insight of being born in defiance of China’s one-child policy offers a unique perspective on the societal implications of declining birth rates and the erosion of traditional family structures.

As South Korea grapples with the repercussions of its declining population, it becomes evident that short-term incentives may not be sufficient to reverse the trend. Addressing deep-rooted issues such as work culture, societal expectations, and financial burdens is crucial in creating a supportive environment for families to thrive. The emphasis on profit-driven motives and economic growth must be balanced with considerations for individual well-being and the long-term sustainability of society.

The global phenomenon of declining birth rates prompts a broader reflection on the consequences of overpopulation and the necessity of prioritizing the quality of life over relentless growth. South Korea’s struggle serves as a poignant reminder of the delicate balance between economic prosperity and social welfare, urging a reevaluation of priorities and a concerted effort to create a more sustainable and inclusive environment for future generations to flourish.