By John Q. Hosedrinker interpretation? Yeah, that sounds like Hawaii rightly rejecting the Supreme Court’s gun nonsense.
It’s no surprise that Hawaii’s Supreme Court has had enough of the Supreme Court’s games. The highest court in the land has a serious legitimacy problem. It’s become a partisan circus, where justices twist themselves into positions to push their own agendas.
The idea of “originalism” sounds nice in theory, but when it comes to the real world, it falls apart. How can the Supreme Court argue whether someone attempting to start an insurrection is protected by the 14th Amendment’s insurrectionist clause? It’s clear as day that oath breakers cannot hold office again, unless Congress says otherwise.
But this Supreme Court seems to care more about their free bribes than actually upholding the laws and history of this country. Hawaii is right to reject them and take their case to the state’s own Supreme Court.
The difference between Hawaii and Texas is stark. Hawaii chose the judicial route, while Texas simply ignored the Supreme Court ruling. Both actions show the lack of legitimacy the court has garnered over the years. It’s twisted itself into this position of using antiquated laws, eliminating established precedent, and failing to take up necessary cases.
The Supreme Court needs to re-establish trust with the American people. The justices themselves have expressed annoyance at the lack of credibility they hold. It’s their job to fix it. Otherwise, states will continue to ignore them and their rulings.
But what happens when a state disregards a Supreme Court ruling? How is the ruling enforced? This is a question that needs to be addressed, as more and more states push back against the court’s decisions.
Hawaii’s rejection of the Supreme Court’s gun nonsense is a step in the right direction. The court has distorted and corrupted the Second Amendment, and it’s about time someone stood up to them.
Chief Justice Roberts once asked why the Supreme Court isn’t viewed as legitimate and credible anymore. Well, maybe it’s because of decisions like this. Maybe it’s because justices like Clarence Thomas can’t be trusted.
This isn’t just about guns. It’s about the credibility of the Supreme Court as a whole. If they can’t serve the needs of the American people, then what purpose do they serve? It’s time for a change, for a non-partisan system that the American people can trust.
The Hawaii Supreme Court is right to reject the nonsense coming from the Supreme Court. They understand the importance of public safety, reducing gun violence, and safeguarding peaceful public movement. They have passed sensible firearms laws that have helped lower their rate of gun deaths.
The Supreme Court may have lost its legitimacy, but Hawaii’s rejection shows that states have the power to push back against their rulings. It’s time for other states to follow suit and stand up against the corruption and disregard for the law that plagues the highest court in the land.
In the end, it’s not just about guns. It’s about the future of our legal system and the trust we place in it. The Supreme Court needs to re-establish itself as a pillar of justice, serving the needs of the American people and upholding the laws and history of this great nation.