China named as hypothetical enemy for 1st time in Japan-U.S. exercise

China named as hypothetical enemy for 1st time in Japan-U.S. exercise

China, the rising global power, has been named as the hypothetical enemy in a recent Japan-U.S. military exercise. This decision marks a significant shift in the strategic priorities of both nations, as they recognize the growing influence and potential threat posed by China. While some may argue that using a real country’s name is diplomatically irresponsible, I believe that it is a necessary step in addressing the realistic challenges and potential conflicts that may arise in the future.

For years, the U.S. Navy has been conducting exercises that simulate combat scenarios against targets emulating Chinese capabilities and armaments. However, these scenarios were often referred to as country Red or some made-up name during briefings and discussions. By explicitly naming China as the hypothetical enemy, it demonstrates a shift towards acknowledging the real-world geopolitical landscape.

Tensions between China and the U.S. have been steadily increasing, and it is important to understand why. Many had hoped that the talks between President Xi and President Biden would improve the situation. However, it seems that China’s actions and ambitions have led to these heightened tensions. Reports of corruption and the use of water as rocket fuel have raised concerns about China’s true intentions.

From a military perspective, China lacks the experience of being involved in a real war, unlike Japan and the United States. While China may boast a growing military presence, their lack of real-world combat experience is a significant factor to consider. However, we must not underestimate their strategic thinking, as China has been engaged in a different kind of war that focuses on asymmetrical tactics, much like the teachings of Sun Tzu.

The decision to explicitly name China as the hypothetical enemy is not only significant for the Japan-U.S. relationship but also for Russia. With Russia being tied down in Ukraine, the U.S. military can finally divert more attention and resources to address the genuine threat that China presents. This shift in focus is long overdue, and it signals a more realistic assessment of the global power balance.

While some may argue that revealing the name of the hypothetical enemy is provocative, I believe it is a necessary step to address the challenges that lie ahead. It allows for more transparent and honest discussions, without hiding behind vague terms or made-up names. By openly discussing the China problem, we can strategize more effectively to protect our interests and maintain peace in the region.

There is no doubt that China poses a significant challenge to the Japan-U.S. alliance and the broader global order. By naming China as the hypothetical enemy, it serves as a wake-up call to the international community, highlighting the need to pay attention to China’s actions and ambitions. It is no longer a time for subtlety or diplomatic formalities. The stakes are too high, and we must address the China question head-on.

In conclusion, the decision to name China as the hypothetical enemy in the Japan-U.S. exercise reflects the changing dynamics of global power and the growing concerns about China’s actions and intentions. It may be seen as diplomatically irresponsible by some, but I believe it is a necessary step in openly addressing the challenges posed by China. It is time for the world to wake up and take a realistic approach to protect our interests and maintain peace in the region.